The two organizations alleged that judges didn’t do enough to ensure that lawyers could shed light on the alleged facts—for instance, when they prevented defense teams from contrasting the testimony of some witnesses with actual footage from the scenes they were describing. Observers from the two organizations, who attended the Supreme Court hearings in person, said that prosecutors called witnesses whose testimonies offered “stereotypical” narratives and didn’t guarantee the right to defense.

After a trial spanning four months, nine of the accused were charged by the public prosecutor with the crime of rebellion, carrying prison sentences of up to 25 years. Throughout the process, defense teams denounced what they saw as repeated violations of their clients’ rights to defense and to a fair trial. The Supreme Court is due to decide on such allegations when the verdict is announced in the coming days.

FIDH and EuroMed Rights also criticized that prosecutors presented as evidence documents to which defense teams had not been guaranteed prior access.

Today @fidh_es and @EuroMedRights have published an observation report denouncing irregularities during the trial against nine politicians and civil society leaders from Catalonia.

➡️ “The trial cannot be considered a fair trial due to the lack of necessary safeguards”. pic.twitter.com/kgv0JM5aqZ

— International Trial Watch (@InterTrialWatch) October 9, 2019

The post Human rights groups denounce serious irregularities in Catalan referendum trial appeared first on VilaWeb.