This comes after some of the officials requested his recusal arguing that shortly after the height of the independence crisis in 2017 he took part in a conference where he was not neutral and took for granted that their moves had been “illegal,” also claiming a misuse of funds. Indeed, Conde-Pumpido said on 23 November 2017 in Spain’s Congress that they had acted “outside the legal framework” and were “subverting the rule of law.”

“They argued that they had a mandate coming from an election; the vote was to elect the regional authority, but they illegally turned it into a pro-independence plebiscite,” he said. Jailed leaders Oriol Junqueras and Raül Romeva, as well as exiled Carles Puigdemont, urged  for his recusal in March in the appeals under discussion. The former Catalan president also argued that Conde-Pumpido has a “close friendship” with public prosecutor Javier Zaragoza, who is also involved in the case.

European Court of Human Rights

Spain’s Constitutional Court still has to have its say on the Supreme Court’s decade-long sentences given to the nine officials convicted on 14 October 2019 – only after the magistrates rule on the issue will the jailed leaders be able to take their case to the European Court of Human Rights, as they intend to do. Meanwhile, the same court also has to decide whether to lift the arrest warrant which hangs over exiled former cabinet members Puigdemont, Lluís Puig, Clara Ponsatí and Toni Comín.

Another Constitutional Court judge, Antonio Narváez, had already withdrawn from the referendum case.

The post Spanish Constitutional Court magistrate withdraws from Catalan referendum case appeared first on VilaWeb.